building the margins
Sunday, October 31, 2004
  all the reasons you would ever need

When I started this blog in July, I intended to post a reason every day for voting against Bush. While I kept at it for a while, I stopped doing so in late August, but continued to write about Bush and Co.

Regardless of the election outcome, I'll continue to write about the state of our union, but for now, here is a list of reasons why we need to oust Bush on Tuesday. I've posted commentary and links about most of the items below so check out my archives for more info if you want.
(These aren't in any particular order.)
  1. bin Laden
  2. Al Queda
  3. Al QaQaa
  4. Abu Ghraib
  5. the elective war on Iraq
  6. failure to promote peace in the Middle East
  7. untrustworthy
  8. the great divider
  9. Cheney
  10. Ashcroft
  11. Rumsfeld
  12. Halliburton
  13. false hope
  14. misrepresentation
  15. federal interference in state's issues
  16. religious hypocrisy (pro life/pro death penalty)
  17. The Texecutioner
  18. Bush's resume
  19. flaking out of the National Guard
  20. questionable ethics
  21. doublethink
  22. tax cuts for the wealthy
  23. school tests rather than school improvements
  24. restrictions on women's rights
  25. lower court appointments
  26. the Supreme Court
  27. loyalty oaths
  28. picking on the NAACP
  29. stop loss policy
  30. the looting of Iraq's historical items
  31. dependence on oil
  32. incompetant reconstruction in Iraq
  33. lack of adequate response in the Sudan
  34. support of the Columbia River dredging project
  35. lack of integrity
  36. stubbornness
  37. breaking down the separation of church and state
  38. homeland insecurity
  39. failure to adequate supply our troops with food, weapons, armor, etc
  40. putting his own plans ahead of the country's needs
  41. the huge deficit
  42. the squandering of our budget surplus
  43. first president with net job loss in ?? years
  44. neo-conservatism controlling our country
  45. damaged relationships with allies
  46. squandering of world good will following 9-11
  47. stonewalling attempts to investigate 9-11
  48. personal smears againsts citizens who speak out against Bush
  49. the inability to take responsibility for any failures
  50. the length of the list of Bush adminstration failures
  51. millions of children without health insurance
  52. global gag rule
  53. new overtime rules
  54. Yucca mountain
  55. moral cowardice
  56. failure to take lead on alternative energy
  57. conducting a war and making our children pay for it
  58. Carl Rove
  59. illegal use of Olympics in campaign ad
  60. war contracts with mercenaries
  61. smearing a decorated Vietnam veteran
  62. Zell Miller
  63. failing the "CEO test" (scroll down to Sept 3)
  64. failing to find WMD in Iraq
  65. failure of intelligence (or purposely misleading?) about WMD in Iraq
  66. further destabilizing the Middle East
  67. 1000+ dead American soldiers in Iraq
  68. using fear to motivate voters
  69. Enron/ Ken Lay
  70. voter suppression by Republicans
  71. world distrust of the US
  72. overblown Iraq/al Queda connection
  73. throwing away of Democratic voter registration cards in Oregon
  74. "win at any cost" tactics
  75. faith vs. logic and reality
  76. increased risk of terrorism due to Bush's foreign policy
  77. rampant use of half truths and false impressions to build support
  78. limiting safety regulations
  79. form letters for families of dead soldiers
  80. "Mission Accomplished" b.s.
  81. Federal Marriage Amendement
  82. promoting creationsim over evolution
  83. ignoring science about global warning
  84. promotion of logging in roadless areas
  85. overextending our military forces
  86. Bush family ties with Saudi oil
  87. Bush family ties with Rev. Moon
  88. damage to our democracy
  89. gag rule on EPA employees
  90. secret meetings with energy company executives
  91. shortchanging small businesses
  92. governance for the corporations rather than for the people
  93. 100,000 dead Iraqis because of our war
  94. unsecured weapons in Iraq
  95. no doubt
  96. America as world's bully
  97. suppression of democratic dissent
  98. solution for everything: privatization
  99. record opium crop in Afghanistan
  100. not democratically elected in 2000
An as a bonus, here's another list of 100 reasons to vote against Bush - article is entitled "100 Facts and 1 Opinion: the Non-Arguable Case Against the Bush Administration."










 
Friday, October 29, 2004
  Wanted by Bush in 2005: 18-34 year olds

Are you 18-34 years old? Female or male? Gay or straight? In school or working? Have computer or medical skills? Only child or one of many siblings?

Congratulations! If Bush gets re-elected, there's a good chance you may be drafted within the next year or two. Why? Because he luvs to start wars and send other people's children to fight in them. And you know he's just itching to get at Iran and Syria. And we certainly aren't leaving Iraq any time soon. How will we have enough soldiers to fight Bush's wars? Why, you'll be in uniform, that's how!

Check out Enjoy the Draft (thanks to Pacific Views for the tip) and read up on why you can expect to be headed to exotic locations against your will some time in the next few years.

While I applaud all the brave folks who sign up for military service, I don't think they or you should have to die for a president who makes bad decisions.
 
Thursday, October 28, 2004
  in halliburton we trust

Finally, the FBI is paying attention to Bush/Cheney's love affair with Halliburton.

Was giving a no-bid contract to the VP's former company illegal? We'll hopefully find out. Unethical? Certainly.

And still people describe Bush as someone they can trust. When will they wake up? The only thing we can trust about Bush and his buddies is that they will seek to make a profit whenever possible. And that they will say that God is on their side in doing so.

Is that what "in god we trust" means? We trust that we'll make money, even if it's on the backs of 100,000 dead Iraqis? How shameful. And how sad that these people represent us.
 
  bush administration's tenuous grip on reality

As further evidence of the administration's shaky grasp of reality and science versus faith and dogma, the group Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility noted a couple of weeks back that the Bush administration has okayed the Grand Canyon to sell a book which claims that the Canyon was formed by Noah's flood.

Thanks to Wonkette for this item. And thanks to all those people out there who prefer to believe in the Bible word for word rather than science. Funny, it seems like it's these same people who think that humans have evolved so much farther than other animals, yet their superstitions (posing as "faith") lead them to doubt scientific evidence of geologic history.

And it's these same people who seem satisfied with what Bush is doing regarding education. Maybe because his education plan focuses so much on teaching to tests and so little on critical thought. I can certainly see why Bush might want to discourage critical thought.

 
  goli: oops i backdated again

funny, this morning there was only one "news" item on Goli Ameri's website dated 10/27/04 and now there are two.

and yesterday (10/27) or the day before a couple of items dated 10/21 and 10/22 appeared... ain't technology grand?

seeing as how Goli is probably Go(li)-ing nowhere in this election despite her attempts to smear Wu (or perhaps because of them - at least one friend of mine who was not sure about voting for Wu became a definite Wu supporter after getting slimy campaign lit from Goli) I see no reason to spend further electronic ink on her failed campaign.

People, just get out there and vote! Yes, more women in Congress would be a great thing, but Goli is the wrong woman at the wrong time. I've had a chance to meet Wu in person, and I really believe that we are better served if he continues as our rep in Congress.
 
  Medical survey results indicate 100,000 casualties from Iraq war

As published in the Guardian today, a new study finds that
"as many as 100,000 more people may have died throughout the country in the 18 months after the U.S. invasion than would be expected based on the death rate before the war."
The study was conducted by several researchers and will be published today in the Lancet, a medical journal.
 
  Ameri endorsed by conservative over-60 lobby group

New on Goli Ameri's "news" page is an endorsement from James Martin of GrayPac. As it states on her website, this group is actively opposed to the estate tax. However, what her website doesn't say is that Mr Martin's group "The 60 Plus Association" is the "conservative alternative to the AARP".

Goli is tring to style herself as a moderate Republican, yet she is getting endorsements from extremely conservative groups.

I did some research on James L Martin (go ahead and Google him yourself) and found that not only is he the head of the 60 Plus Association, he has been
buddies with W since the 60's, he has published at least one commentary about tax reform in the Moonie-owned Washington Times, and he is the president of the Calvert Institute, a conservative think tank with tons of Heritage Foundation and Cato Institute people listed as "experts".

(In the spirit of Halloween and the scariness of the season, click here if you want to read an actual speech of the Reverend Sun Myung Moon.)

According to the sites listed above, Martin supports privatizing Social Security and drilling in ANWAR. Since he has an article on repealing the death tax on the website of the National Retail Sales Tax Association, it's likely that he supports a national retail sales tax.

He is against re-importation of medication and the Kyoto treaty. He apparently even doubts that global warming is occurring. In a speech in 2000, he notes that the 60-Plus organization is an active member in the Cooler Heads Coalition, a group dedicated to dispelling the myths of global warming.

It could even be argued that Martin's lobbying efforts (scroll down) in Florida helped put Bush in the White House.

Yikes. If Martin and his PAC are supporting Goli, what is are expecting in return if she wins?




 
Monday, October 25, 2004
  Republican women turning against Bush

The Guardian had an article yesterday naming several prominent Republican women who are speaking out against Bush and his "wacky, far right" position on women's rights.

Linda Binder, an Arizona Republican state senator and MaryLou Halliburton, of the family who started the company Cheney led before becoming VP are two of many Republican women who are speaking out against the administration, marching in pro-choice rallies, or contributing funds to Kerry rather than Bush.

Earlier this month I wrote about the contradiction inherent in Bush's supposed "pro women" stance and his actions and beliefs regarding abortion and the global gag rule. I'm glad to know that there are smart Republican women out there who also see the wrongheadedness of Bush's position and are willing to stand up and do something about it.

 
Sunday, October 24, 2004
  goli ameri and the slime machine

We received Goli Ameri's ad this week which included the complete text of the Oregonian article about Wu. Apart from probably being illegal (republishing an article without copyright permission), this to me proves that Goli is indeed taking lessons from Rove.

Back in August I wrote about Rove (scroll down to Aug 29) and his "win at any cost/stay above the fray" tactics. I also linked to a Salon article about this. The article highlighted how Rove's candidates use surrogates to smear the opponent while the candidate declines to get involved in order to appear to focus on actual issues.

Goli breaks from the Rove model since the attack ad is clearly from her campaign office (13500 SW Pacific Highway), yet she sticks to the model since she has nothing posted about it (as of 10/24, 9:45 am, several days after the ad was mailed) on her campaign website which is all sugar and and light. She doesn't even have a link to the original Oregonian article on her campaign news page.

Blue Oregon has an interesting post about this. But I doubt Goli is embarrassed by her ad - I think it's just that she's playing by Rove's Rules and is trying to appear to her followers that she is focused on issues, rather appearing that she is getting down in the mud in order to slime her opponent. I'm curious to know who this mailing went out to. Did it go out to registered Republicans, or only to Democratic households?

There are a lot of candidates this year who are really wolves dressed in sheep's clothing, and I think Goli is one of them.
 
Wednesday, October 20, 2004
  stolen truth... the republican smear campaign against Kerry

Daily Kos has a transcription of the text of Stolen Honor, the anti Kerry propaganda movie Sinclair Broadcast Group is planning to show at no charge on some of their stations this week.

Sinclair backed off their plans to air the movie in its entirety after their stock price dropped 16% this week, but they are still planning to air some portion of it.

The airing of this movie is dirty politics. Carlton Sherwood, the so-called journalist who put this piece of Bush campaign propaganda together, has actually been hired by the Bush administration to manage a federal website, and formerly worked for Tom Ridge.

This is nothing more than a long swift boats ad aimed the US public, and broadcast for free by partisan hacks on our publicly owned airwaves.

Kerry fought valiantly in the Vietnam war, and returned to speak out against the war. Sherwood and the Republicans are using Kerry's heroic acts to paint him in a negative light. Meanwhile, George W Bush was doing what? Screwing sorority girls? Doing lines? Getting wasted? Working for daddy? Not taking medical exams? Not showing up for guard duty?


I want a president who actually had the courage to fight in a war and to stand up and speak out against war, not a president who hid behind his daddy.

Bush doesn't care about our soldiers. He has no idea what they are going through. His father sent soldiers to war in Iraq over 10 years ago and W's government still refuses to acknowledge the reality of Gulf War Syndrome. He doesn't even bother to send more than a form letter of condolence to families of soldiers who died in Iraq. He's not even signing some of the letters himself - that's how little he cares about whether your husband, wife, father, mother, sister or brother dies for his unnecessary war.

Don't kid yourself. Bush may be a fun guy to sit and watch the World Series with, but he is not a man fit to run our country. All his talk of faith and moral courage mask an administration rotting from the inside with greed, corruption, and moral cowardice.

And if you think that they won't manufacture evidence for another war, or turn to a draft to solve the mess they've made of Iraq, you are dangerously naive.
 
  vote for love, not hate

Why is it that every couple of years a bunch of people get together to put an initiative on the ballot promoting bigotry, discrimination and hate of gay people? What do they fear so much?

Do they really think that they or their children are in danger if gay people get the right to marry? Or is it just that gay marriage takes them one step further away from their goal of banishing gay people from our state and from our country?

I would hope that in the 21st century we might be past the witch-burning stage and would be able to act with dignity, reason and tolerance toward our fellow citizens. But between hate-backed initiatives like Measure 36 and the freeper outrage over Kerry mentioning the L word last week, I guess some people are still in the dark ages.

Here's a quote from an article in Village Voice about an anti- gay marriage rally in DC.
"I'm voting for Bush," said a kindly middle-aged woman from Pennsylvania, who said she was "too cowardly" to give her name. "I don't like his corporate policies, but I believe in his family values."

Wonderful. So it's ok for Bush to put corporations above families as long as he puts traditional families above gay families? What kind of crazy logic is that?

Maybe I misread the bible. Maybe the 10 commandments said it's ok to steal and kill if you are president of a democratic country. Maybe the golden rule is actually "love thy neighbor as thyself but prevent them from having the same rights that you have".

A friend recently told me that although she is firmly against Measure 36, she can't put a yard sign out because she is the member of a conservative Christian church and her family would be ostracized if church members knew her thoughts on this matter.

This is what happens when fascism starts to set in. Corporate control of the state, and people afraid to speak out to protect the rights of others. I know there were Christians in Nazi Germany who wanted to speak out for their Jewish friends and neighbors but didn't out of fear for the repercussions.

As an antidote for hatred, please check out the Oregon website Marriage Matters. And please, please, please... don't vote for hate in Oregon. And speak out - our democracy depends on it.
 
  Gore speaks out

Here is a link to the text of Gore's speech yesterday at a MoveOn event in DC.

Let me explain... No, let me sum up...

Here are a list of words and phrases which Gore used which quite aptly describe Bush, his actions or beliefs, and his supporters over the past four years.


...and all of that is in the first half of the speech.
Thanks for speaking out, Al.

Remind me again why any sane person would vote for Bush? The only answer I get from Republican friends or family members is that we must "stay the course". Stay the course of lies, deception and greed? Stay the course of inexperience, ineptitude and inscrutibility? Stay the course of death, destruction and denial? Stay the course of corruption, cronyism, and chaos? No, thank you.





 
Tuesday, October 19, 2004
  new report: Iraq war increases risk of terrorism

The International Institute for Strategic Studies released its annual report this morning on the world's militaries.

From a Reuters article about the report:

War in Iraq has increased the risk of terrorism against the West, at least for the short term, the International Institute for Strategic Studies has said in its annual report on the world's militaries.

The IISS has added a section on Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network to "The Military Balance," its authoritative yearly defence handbook, which lists the size and capabilities of the world's armed forces.

"Overall, the risk of terrorism to Westerners and Western assets in Arab countries appeared to increase after the Iraq war began in March 2003," it concluded.

"With the military invasion and occupation of Iraq, the United States demonstrated its desire to change the political status quo in the Arab world to advance American strategic and political interests," it said in Tuesday's report.

"Accordingly, the Iraq invasion was always likely in the short term to enhance Jihadist recruitment and intensify al Qaeda's motivation to encourage and assist terrorist operations."

The report also says that although we have been able to stop the flow of some money to Al Qaeda, they are able to hit some targets (such as Madrid) with smaller amounts of funds.

Here's a link to the Editor's Forward for the report, which specifically mentions the US and issues regarding Iraq, such as interoperability problems between allies, readiness for asymetrical warfare, and the "manpower intensive" nature of the post-war environment.

Hmmm... wonder what the White House spin on this one will be? Or maybe they'll just ignore it. Who needs thoughfully researched reports when God is on our side?


 
  Do W's rose colored glasses help with his failure of vision?

Despite Bush's rosy characterization of Afghanistan's election last week, analysts say that in fact Afghanistan's problems are still large and numerous. Major problems include the flourishing opium poppy cultivation and warlord control of much of the country.

Perhaps the reason why Bush is postponing his annual physical until after the election has something to do with his failing vision?
 
  are we more secure? new report says NO

Despite Dick "I lie like there's no tomorrow" Cheney's fear-mongering talk today on the campaign trail, a new report released yesterday from Public Citizen, a non-profit public interest group, reports that in fact it's the Bush administration who is failing to secure the homeland.

From the press release about the report:

The report, Homeland Unsecured: The Bush Administration’s Hostility to Regulation and Ties to Industry Leave America Vulnerable, details how the Bush administration has failed to harden our defenses against terrorism and secure the most vulnerable, high-impact targets. The report is based on an analysis of five key areas – chemical plants, nuclear plants, hazardous material transport, ports and water systems. The report is available at www.HomelandUnsecured.org.
“Since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, President Bush has made protection of the American people from terrorism the rhetorical centerpiece of his presidency,” said Public Citizen President Joan Claybrook. “Yet this administration has failed to use its executive powers or support legislation to mandate regulatory requirements that should be taken. Bush has abdicated his responsibility to protect America from the risk of terrorist attacks because he is fundamentally hostile to regulation of private industry and is loath to cross his big money campaign contributors.”
On the campaign trail, the administration is falling back on their old trick of playing the fear card when their ratings (or polls) are down. However, I think it's Cheney, Bush and Rumsfeld who can't "get their minds around" the idea that they are creating new terrorists abroad while failing to adequately protect our homeland.
 
Monday, October 18, 2004
  Bush and his unreal reality

Essential reading: Suskind's NY Times article (reg req) on Bush and his faith-based reality.

excerpt here:

In the summer of 2002, after I had written an article in Esquire that the White House didn't like about Bush's former communications director, Karen Hughes, I had a meeting with a senior adviser to Bush. He expressed the White House's displeasure, and then he told me something that at the time I didn't fully comprehend -- but which I now believe gets to the very heart of the Bush presidency.

The aide said that guys like me were ''in what we call the reality-based community,'' which he defined as people who ''believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.'' I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. ''That's not the way the world really works anymore,'' he continued. ''We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.''


 
Friday, October 15, 2004
  responsibility parable for kids (or US presidents)

Here's a lesson or parable on fiscal and ethical responsibility you can share with your kids, or with adults who are considering Bush as a viable option in three weeks.

Imagine that your parents entrusted you with their bank account which included their life savings. Say that life savings was $250,000. Your job was to make sure that that money was still available in 4 years, and that maybe it even grew a bit. Your parents would use their income every year for expenses rather than drawing on the savings.

Imagine that during those four years your dad loses his job and has to use some of the savings to cover some expenses.
Also during those 4 years, you decide to give money to some kids at school so that they will like you more, even though those kids live in the wealthiest part of town.
And you also decide that even though the school bully hasn't been bugging you lately, you want to make sure that he never bugs you again so you pay a bunch of your friends to beat up on him and his whole family, including his little sisters and brothers.

Imagine that after 4 years, your parents ask to see the bank statement with their savings balance. They are shocked to discover that not only is their savings now gone, but you spent another 250,000 on their credit cards and haven't paid any of it back yet.

Not only are you now in debt, but your neighbors view your family as the town's biggest bully.

Would you have been acting in a fiscally responsible manner? Would you have been acting ethically? What should you have done differently? What would Jesus have done?

Welcome to W's world. He spent the surplus Clinton left us, and left us in debt for at least that amount. Under his watch, the US went from being viewed sympathetically by our allies to being viewed as the world's bully. Is it fiscally responsible or even rational to vote for Bush based on his economic and international policy track record? I don't think so...
 
Thursday, October 14, 2004
  fraudulent voter registration in Oregon funded by GOP?

On the KGW (reg. req.) news tonight, reporters showed a recent interview with a young man who was collecting voter registration cards in Portland. The man said he was paid $5 for each Republican voter registration card he turned in, and that he had thrown out some cards of people who registered as Democrats.

Josh Marshall had a link to the job posting on careerbuilder.com for the company this young man in Portland was working for: Sproul and Associates aka Voter's Outreach of America (VOA) aka "American Votes". VOA is one of the companies which collected signatures to try to get Nader on the ballot in Arizona. This company apparently has been hiring workers for voter registration in several states. They have been using the name "America Votes" which was already the name of another group working to register voters.

Here is the job posting text, taken directly from careerbuilder.com:

$8.50/hr part-time,
$10.00/hr full-time
Canvassing Neighborhoods in Support of the GOP!

Voter's Outreach of America is hiring door-to-door canvassers asking people to register to vote. Must be at least 18 yrs of age, no felonies, registered to vote and have own transportation. Need good communication skills and professional appearance. Hours are 4pm to 8pm Monday-Friday and 8am to noon Saturday.

Call toll free 702-307-1320 for more information.

Paid for by the Republican National Committee. www.gop.com. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

Source - Reno Gazette Journal - Reno, NV


In another example of Republican obfuscation, you'll note that it said that it's paid for by the Republican National Committee and then it says that it's not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. Clearly, though, it was funded by the GOP, and the link on the job announcement takes you directly to the GOP website.

It's also interesting that the job is listed in the "non-profit" section. Is the GOP considered a non-profit organization? Is Sproul and Associates non-profit?

Hardy Myers is starting an investigation into this matter. There have been questions about Sproul and Associates' practices in Oregon since at least September when someone from their organization tried to get space at some Oregon libraries to set up "non-partisan" voter registration tables.

I wonder how many Democratic voters in our state and across the country have been disenfranchised because of this company's fraudulent (by their own employees' admission) practices, which were apparently funded by the GOP?
 
  presidential whoppers regarding healthcare

Tonight in the presidential debate (see full text here.) W said:

"there's no market forces involved with health care."
Oh yeah? Check out this Washington Post article (reg. reg) about the effect of supply and demand on the price of the flu vaccine.

"And just look at other countries that have tried to have federally controlled health care. They have poor-quality health care."
Oh yeah? Maybe W should talk with some people in Canada, France, Spain or Japan for starters about their universal healthcare systems.

"Our health-care system is the envy of the world because we believe in making sure that the decisions are made by doctors and patients, not by officials in the nation's capital."
Oh yeah? Check out this press release from the World Health Organization in 2000. The US spends more of its GDP on health care than any other country, but ranked 37th overall in healthcare.

Tonight I watched on local news about people lining up at the Clackamas county Costco for flu vaccines that they weren't able to get from their doctors. How does it happen that a retail store is able to supply flu vaccine but people's own doctors can't provide it for their patients?
Something is very wrong in our health care system.

A friend who is a doctor in the Monterey area recently wrote to me about how the biggest provider of health care to indigent people in Moneterey county is going under. And another provider is not taking on any new patients so thousands of people are left to rely only on care for acute emergencies.

Do you trust Bush to solve problems like these? I certainly don't. Especially given his penchant for ignoring reality, as evidenced in tonight's debate.


 
Wednesday, October 13, 2004
  Catholic bishops say voting for Kerry is a sin

Wow. I was almost starting to think that people's actions during this election season couldn't sink much lower into the mud. Then I heard on Air America yesterday about Catholic Bishops who are saying that voting for Kerry is sinful because of his stance on abortion and stem cell research.

According to this New York Times article (reg. req.)

In an interview in his residence here, Archbishop Chaput said a vote for a candidate like Mr. Kerry who supports abortion rights or embryonic stem cell research would be a sin that must be confessed before receiving Communion.

"If you vote this way, are you cooperating in evil?" he asked. "And if you know you are cooperating in evil, should you go to confession? The answer is yes."


Wow. So, it's ok to vote for Bush who declared war on a country that wasn't attacking us, which has so resulted in the deaths of over 1100 American soldiers and 13000 Iraqi civilians, but voting for Kerry, who believes that the rights of an unborn child shouldn't trump the rights of a mother, is a sin?

Voting for Bush, who has taken money from the poor and given it to the rich via our tax system is just fine, but voting for Kerry, who wants to be able to use embryonic stem cells to save millions of lives is a sin?

It's not sinful to vote for George W Bush aka "The Texecutioner" who supports corporate welfare but not people on welfare???

Wow. I left the Catholic church years ago because I thought the teachings were overly concerned with regulating sex and not concerned enough about stopping violence. I guess not much has changed. I just hope that there are a lot of good Catholics out there who can see through this Bush**it and realize where the true evil lies.


 
Monday, October 11, 2004
  bush wired?

I've taken a blogging hiatus for the past few days due to work, but got back online today.

I hadn't heard anything about "Audiogate" until today (yes, I've been out of touch!)... Here's a link to a Salon article about it, and also an article at the Washington Dispatch with a very clear picture of Bush with a mysterious square bluge on his back.

Interesting that according to the rules of the first debate, the candidates weren't supposed to have been filmed from the back.

Personally, I wouldn't be surprised if Bush was being fed info by aides during the debate. If it is true, the voting public needs to be aware of it.

update: here's a link to a photo of Bush from the back from last Friday's debate.
 
Tuesday, October 05, 2004
  administration officials flip-flop on the al Qaeda/Saddam connection

Both Rumsfeld (full text here; scroll down to question from Glenn Hutchins) and Cheney (and here; login req.) have now been caught this week contradicting themselves regarding the connection between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda.

What is going on here? And why is Paul Bremer now saying that there weren't enough troops on the ground at the start of the war on Iraq?

I think the administration is losing control of all the stories they have told about this war. Sooner or later, the American public still in denial will realize that Bush, Cheney and Co. have just been spinning one story after another, that they went to war too soon, and that they have done immense damage to our credibility around the world.
 
Sunday, October 03, 2004
  Bush: the (oxy)moron

I was driving around yesterday and noticed another "W stands for Women" yard sign. Personally, I'm not falling for this bit of campaign propaganda. You can't be anti-choice and pro-women at the same time.

Because of the "global gag rule" which prohibits US support of organizations that provide information about abortion, many women around the world are dying from unsafe abortions.

This pdf file from the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice highlights the differences between Bush and Kerry regarding reproductive rights.
 
Friday, October 01, 2004
  US leadership and motives distrusted around the world

The Guardian has an article today discussing the results of a couple surveys. One found that in the world court of opinion, the US is increasingly being distrusted for our role as "policeman". The study also found that in some cases, the world community feels that the US isn't getting involved quickly enough in certain situations such in the Sudan.

This seems like a contradiction, but perhaps it's not. It seems rational to me that other countries might wish that we would use our wealth and power for "good" (humanitarian purposes) rather than for "bad" (world domination).

By starting a pre-emptive war with Iraq, it seems we have probably made the world community very wary of us. At the same time, by failing to be pro-active in the Sudan, we are reinforcing the opinion that we only will get involved in world affairs if there is some benefit to us.

The other survey cited in the Guardian article found that over 3/4's of US citizen's don't want the US to be "planetary law enforcer," but they do feel strongly that the US should help prevent genocide.

It's striking that both international and national opinion seem to be in opposition of current US foreign policy.
 
If change is to come, it will have to come from the outside. It will have to come from the margins. -Wendell Berry _______________________________________ Proud member of the reality-based community

WHAT WAS SAID...
July 2004 / August 2004 / September 2004 / October 2004 / November 2004 / December 2004 / January 2005 / February 2005 / March 2005 / April 2005 /

NEWS
BBC News
The Guardian
Mother Jones
NY Times (reg. req.)
Reuters
Washington Post


NEWS COMPILERS
Alternet
Buzzflash
Cursor
Tidepool


BLOGS I LIKE
Atrios/Eschaton
Baghdad Burning
Basie!
Michael Berube Online
The Blue Lemur
Blue Oregon
Camelsbackandforth
juancole
Daily Kos
Brad DeLong
Dooce
Fafblog
Hullabaloo
Left Coaster
My Whim is Law
Mykeru
The Note
Poor Man
Scratch & Sniff
Strangechord
Taipei Kid
Talking Points Memo/Josh Marshall
Tom Tomorrow
Whiskey Bar
Wonkette


OTHER INTRIGUING SITES
Oregon Blogs
Center for American Progress
On The Media
Bus Project
Ill Will Press
Northwest Earth Institute
White House For Sale


Powered by Blogger